|
|
|
Climate Crossroads Blog
Sierra Club India Environment Post: ONergy’s Answer to Why New Coal?
Posted by:
Brian F. on
October 18, 2010 at
11:28AM PST
by Justin Guay
I recently
had the opportunity to sit down and talk with social entrepreneur Piyush Jaju,
cofounder of ONergy (www.onergy.in ) a Renewable
Energy Venture providing complete energy solutions to rural The
company has received backing from some of the social entrepreneurial world’s
finest (SELCO and Barefoot Power) and was born out of an
NGO exploring the question Why new coal? The
result was a journey across the coal belt of What inspired you? About
three years ago we (Piyush Jaju, Vinay Jaju, and Ekta Kothari Jaju) got
interested in how we could make a difference. We started with an NGO focused on
climate change and sustainability with an outreach program to schools and colleges
to improve people’s awareness and involving them to take action. From there we got
the idea to travel by cycle along the coal belt at a grassroots level, write a
paper on our experience, and take it to the policy level and see what action
could be taken. It’s not an issue that We then
wanted to look at how we could directly address the problem. It’s easy to say
we have a climate problem and coal is extremely harmful. But what is the
solution? Renewable energy is expensive. And We
realized that decentralization of energy is the solution to address the rural
energy needs. But we need to promote affordable solutions for rural On Clean Cookstoves… It’s
critical to understand the benefits – including economic. If they [rural
villagers] have to pay for the wood there are direct benefits. We are trying a
pilot with a few portable cookstoves. We are looking at all rural energy needs starting
with the lighting program then moving to cookstoves. Lighting is a much more critical need in
terms of saving money (kerosene and battery). The toughest part of the job is satisfying our customers We started
by promoting small lanterns ($13 or Rs 600). The market wanted something bigger
(i.e. something that could power TVs). We went back to the drawing board to
find how we could make affordable larger systems available. We decided that
what we really needed to do was widen the range of products available to our
customers in order to match demand. But the bigger challenge is really to build
an effective distribution channel as well as the after sales service network. And
accessibility is a problem – this all needs to be done in a cost effective way
by using existing networks, training entrepreneurs etc. Entrepreneurs often come
to us they say this is a great product how do we promote it. On the Broader impacts… It’s
important to think of our direct and indirect impact. When we are looking at
going to villages we need to ensure community development, empowering people by
building entrepreneurs, helping marginalized people, and working with womens’
self help groups. We need direct economic benefit because they pay a massive
price for terrible quality light from kerosene. For basic needs they pay such a
large price. How can products directly save money for them? We also find linkages to livelihoods and
community development and we are becoming involved in those areas. On Coal’s ability to deliver on development… It could
have been an argument in the past but now we have alternatives whose prices are
decreasing. Getting on the ground, it’s not feasible for the government to
provide electricity to very remote rural areas. They will have to build new
lines that will have massive transmission losses. The amount of money they will
be spending and then losing would be better spent subsidizing renewable energy
for rural areas. It’s a clear solution. In the
short run, coal will dominate. But Right now
because of the drop in prices it’s more about how you can get financing in
place and make those products affordable so that the rural person doesn’t have
to worry about capital expenditure. On biomass and small hydro… We truly
feel that What about the traditional aid/subisdy approach? It does
not solve a problem if we give something for free. This needs to be market
driven. We are working with Rotary International on a project and we had to
convince them to stop giving systems for free. The rural person is willing to
pay if they see the benefit - in terms of cost and energy provided. In our
Rotary project we used their funds to provide a small subsidy instead of
subsidizing an entire system. Now we can finance 120 systems instead of 20-30
systems only. What’s next? Our ride
has been challenging. But in a short span of time we have sold 1,000 lighting
systems. Our aim is to impact 1 million lives in the next five years. Initially
we will start with lighting, and then move to electrification and cooking. We have strong partnerships with MFIs and
NGOs and have made our business model more robust. KDS (Kotalipara development
society) and VSSU are our
by Justin Guay A final message… Find
unconventional solutions that are market driven. Start challenging notions
about rural |
Categories
• Consequences
• Energy • Food & Drink • Communities • Home & Garden • Curbing Carbon • Nature • Current Events • Education • Politics • Finance • Skeptics • Interviews • Solutions • Jobs • Green Cuisine • Take Action • Transportation • Lazy Organic Gardener • Green Livelihoods Center • Eco-Hero • BP Oil Disaster • India • Coal
Archives
• Current Entries
• November 2010 • October 2010 • September 2010 • August 2010 • July 2010 • June 2010 • May 2010 • April 2010 • March 2010 • February 2010 • January 2010 • December 2009 • November 2009 • October 2009 • September 2009 • August 2009 • July 2009 • June 2009 • May 2009 • April 2009 • March 2009 • February 2009 • January 2009 • December 2008 • November 2008
Latest Entries
Loading...
|